PIL in Delhi HC seeking to quash rule that only women candidates are eligible for BSc (Hons)

DN Bureau

The impugned rule is discriminatory and overlooks the fact that nursing profession has evolved and person of any gender can take up this profession, the PIL said. Read further on Dynamite News:

Representational Image
Representational Image


New Delhi: A Public Interest Litigation (PIL) has been moved in Delhi High Court seeking to quash the existing rule that only women candidates are eligible for BSc(Hons) Nursing Course in Nursing Colleges run by All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS) Delhi University and the Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University.

A plea has been moved by the India Profesional Nurses Association (IPNA), a non-governmental registered body that further seeks direction to the Union of India and the Government of Delhi to consider bringing a fresh rule, which provides that persons of all genders are eligible for admission to BSc(Hons) nursing courses.

Also Read | PIL in Delhi HC seeks removal of Arvind Kejriwal from CM post

The impugned rule is discriminatory and overlooks the fact that nursing profession has evolved and person of any gender can take up this profession, states the plea.

The Plea has been moved through Advocate Robin Raju and Aanchal Bumb further stated that the issue in a nutshell is that male and third-gender candidates are made to face discrimination in the admission process laid out by nursing colleges that are affiliated with respondents.

Also Read | Delhi HC dismisses PIL against Rahul Gandhi, Kejriwal and Akhilesh Yadav alleging false statements made by them

The plea also mentions that Kerala is one those states where Nursing is truly being considered as field where the potential to excel is considered same irrespective of gender. The Government of Kerala has even recently announced reservation for transgender students in nursing courses in the State.

"The practice of considering only female candidates eligible for admission to BSc(Hons) Nursing Course is manifestly arbitrary and does not meet the standard of reasonable nexus to object sought to be achieved and reasonale classification based on intelligible differentia imposed by Article 14", the PIL said. (with ANI inputs)










Related Stories