Dynamite News Centre notifies appointment of five lawyers as Bombay High Court judges
Their appointments are for a period of two years, effective from the date they assume charge of their respective offices, as stated in the notification. Read further on Dynamite News:
New Delhi: The Centre through the Con Wednesday notified the appointment of five advocates as judges of the Bombay High Court.
According to the notification, the President, exercising the power conferred by clause (1) of Article 224 of the Constitution of India, has appointed Nivedita Prakash Mehta, Prafulla Surendrakumar Khubalkar, Ashwin Damodar Bhobe, Rohit Wasudeo Joshi, and Advait Mahendra Sethna as Additional Judges of the Bombay High Court.
Appointments for two years
Their appointments are for a period of two years, effective from the date they assume charge of their respective offices, as stated in the notification.
On September 24, the Supreme Court collegium, led by Chief Justice Dr DY Chandrachud and including Justices Sanjiv Khanna and BR Gavai, recommended the appointment of Nivedita Prakash Mehta, Prafulla Surendrakumar Khubalkar, Ashwin Damodar Bhobe, Rohit Wasudeo Joshi, and Advait Mahendra Sethna as judges of the Bombay High Court.
The collegium noted that on January 19, 2024, the Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court, in consultation with his two senior-most colleagues, recommended the names of the mentioned advocates for appointment as judges.
Collegium reviewed proposal
The collegium also reviewed the views of the Chief Ministers and Governors of Maharashtra and Goa regarding this proposal before making its recommendation.
Also Read |
Malegaon blast: After HC snub, Col Purohit moves SC seeking bail
In order to ascertain the suitability of the above-named Advocates for elevation to the High Court, we have consulted our colleagues conversant with the affairs of the High Court of Bombay.
For the purpose of assessing the merit and suitability of the above candidates for elevation to the High Court, we have scrutinized and evaluated the material placed on record. We have also perused the observations made by the Department of Justice in the file, further noted the Collegium. (with Agency inputs)